Goldwater Institute Challenges Pima County Data Center Moratorium
The Goldwater Institute has declared Pima County's moratorium on data centers illegal, asserting they pose no threat, while a county supervisor contends that data centers increase ambient temperatures, necessitating a review of zoning laws.
Phoenix, AZ, September 29, 2026 —
The Goldwater Institute has formally challenged the legality of Pima County’s moratorium on data center development. The conservative think tank asserts that these facilities do not constitute a threat to the county, a stance that directly opposes the reasoning behind the imposed restrictions.
The county supervisor’s name was not provided in the available information. However, this unnamed supervisor maintains that data centers contribute to an increase in ambient temperatures within the region. This environmental concern, according to the supervisor, highlights a need for a comprehensive review of Pima County’s current zoning laws to address the potential impacts of such infrastructure.
The conflict centers on differing perspectives regarding the environmental and economic implications of data centers. While the Goldwater Institute views the moratorium as an unjustified impediment, the county supervisor’s position suggests a regulatory approach is necessary to mitigate perceived negative effects, particularly concerning local climate conditions. The assertion from the Goldwater Institute implies that the county may be overstepping its authority by enacting a broad ban without sufficient evidence of harm. Conversely, the supervisor’s argument points to an ongoing environmental consideration that zoning regulations should proactively manage.
The specific details of the moratorium, including its start date, duration, and the precise legal basis for its challenge by the Goldwater Institute, were not provided. Likewise, the identity of the county supervisor and the exact nature of the zoning law review they are advocating for remain undisclosed. The debate signifies a broader discussion occurring in many jurisdictions about the balance between technological development, economic benefits, and environmental sustainability. Without further details on the specific legal arguments or the proposed zoning revisions, the scope and potential resolution of this dispute are unclear.
Story summarized from the original created by Taylor Griffith on www.kjzz.org, see more information here.
Media gallery
